Comments on: Aquatennial Fireworks http://photoblog.twincityphotos.com/2008/07/aquatennial-fireworks/ Mon, 23 Jan 2012 04:27:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: snapshutter http://photoblog.twincityphotos.com/2008/07/aquatennial-fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-45 snapshutter Tue, 29 Jul 2008 23:40:07 +0000 http://photoblog.twincityphotos.com/?p=159#comment-45 No on the contrary, night photography would be what you'd want to use noise reduction for. It's just that it was slowing me down in a situation where you want to be taking as many shots as you can, hoping to catch a few good ones. I haven't done a thorough comparison yet between the 4th and aqua shots to tell how well it works. No on the contrary, night photography would be what you’d want to use noise reduction for. It’s just that it was slowing me down in a situation where you want to be taking as many shots as you can, hoping to catch a few good ones. I haven’t done a thorough comparison yet between the 4th and aqua shots to tell how well it works.

]]> By: Dusty Lens http://photoblog.twincityphotos.com/2008/07/aquatennial-fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-44 Dusty Lens Tue, 29 Jul 2008 04:08:57 +0000 http://photoblog.twincityphotos.com/?p=159#comment-44 Still, great photos of the fireworks. Wish I wuld have atteended this event. so, the in-camera noise reduction should not be used for night photography? Still, great photos of the fireworks. Wish I wuld have atteended this event.

so, the in-camera noise reduction should not be used for night photography?

]]>